DEAR CAROLYN: I know this is going to sound SO DUMB.
My boyfriend participates in the Renaissance Faire. He enjoys this greatly, and doing so has greatly enhanced his self-esteem.
However, what this means for me is that from October to April, his life is pretty much that. He is gone every weekend from February to April.
- After embarrassment, Seattle finds public toilet that's just right
- NFL.com says Seahawks have most talented roster in league, and speculate on starting lineup
- Seattle's best restaurants? Classics revisited
- Kyle Seager saves Mariners, 7-6, in 10 innings
- Capitol Hill light-rail station nearly ready for trains to rumble
Most Read Stories
At first I was very supportive. I said, “If our relationship is meant to last, then this will be but a drop in the bucket … .” Now that I’ve gone through the first year of it, I feel very differently.
I work a very stressful job, and weekends were pretty much when we were spending our quality time. Now it feels like we’ve been apart forever, and I feel as though our relationship has suffered.
I really want to talk to him about this, but I am also averse to being a controlling girlfriend. I thought about asking him to compromise and only work part time at the Faire next year, but I don’t know if that’s asking too much or if I’m being selfish.
I thought about joining myself, but I don’t want my life to be taken over the way his has.
Saying, “I am torn — I see how much you love the Faire and I am happy for you, but I don’t like essentially losing you to the Faire from October to April,” does not make you a control freak, or a manipulator, or a nagging girlfriend. It makes you a SO NORMAL human being who has the capacity and sense to articulate your needs and desires.
Two people on equal footing in a relationship do this for each other: When their feelings are strong enough to be significant, they share those feelings and give the other person a chance to respond. The alternative is to be quietly unhappy and leave your partner to either divine your unhappiness or miss it entirely — at least, until it spills over as a much bigger, more consequential issue than it ever had to be.
As long as you recognize that what each of you does with the information is up to you, to share is to show respect.
DEAR CAROLYN: Both of my kids (under 7) participate in activities requiring a different parent to bring snacks each week. Inevitably, some other parent will send around an email saying that it’s best if the kiddos eat something with whole grains and no food coloring and please no juice because it has so much sugar in it and it would be best if you just brought apple slices. Because the obesity crisis is so, so very dire.
I mean, these are healthy, skinny kids. There is surely an obesity crisis in this country, but you’d never know it to look at my 5-year-old’s soccer team.
What is the best way to tell these people to stuff a high-fructose sock in it?
– Suburban problems
DEAR SUBURBAN PROBLEMS:
There are food zealots, yes. There are also stuff-your-food-zealotry zealots, and when you’ve all moved past the parenthood phase of life, one of two things will be true: You’ll recall these child-rearing dogmas and anti-dogmas and find them silly, or you’ll be convinced your preferred (anti-)dogma is the very reason your children turned out so successfully compared with everyone else’s botched science experiments.
If you envision yourself as the former, then just bring the (allergy-dodging) snack you want your kid to eat x 20 because that’s the only sure way not to escalate a snack into a Statement. If you envision yourself as the latter, then by all means obey the snack police publicly.
If you want to go completely radical, then question the snack itself: Since when is it a collective truth that kids can’t make it through an hour of swarm-soccer without organized caloric intervention?