DEAR CAROLYN: Five years ago, my mother became unable to continue living alone, so she came to live with me, my husband and two young children. As she physically declined, she paid for upgrades to our home that allowed her to stay with us longer. However, in the last year she began to fail, and I was diagnosed with a chronic illness, so we made the difficult decision to move her into assisted living. She is doing well, and I was able to return to school and go back to work full time.
Now, my mother-in-law is unable live to alone. Unbeknown to us, my husband’s sisters put her house on the market and told her, since we have a “senior-citizen-ready” house, she would live with us! We only found out when my husband called his mother for Mother’s Day.
To his credit, my husband said this was not going to happen due to my health issues; he travels for his job and the primary responsibility for her care would fall to me.
- On his birthday, Russell Wilson gives Seattle Seahawks perhaps his greatest game to beat Pittsburgh Steelers
- Update: Seahawks' Jimmy Graham suffers right knee injury vs. Steelers, will miss rest of season
- Suspected burglar dies after getting stuck in chimney
- Seattle Seahawks’ swagger, hopes for playoffs are back after they slam door on Pittsburgh Steelers
- Grading the game: Seattle Seahawks’ offense earns perfect mark against Pittsburgh Steelers
Most Read Stories
His sisters’ response was to call us “selfish” and state that caring for their mother does not suit their lifestyles since they are raising young families. They won’t speak to us. My mother-in-law told my husband she is “hurt beyond words” that we will not do for her what we did for my mother.
How do we handle this?
DEAR SELFISH?: Either you cave, and pay dearly for it, or stand tall and pay dearly for it.
You’ve already decided the consequences to your health rule out caregiving; that seems rock-solid to me, except perhaps if turning away your mother-in-law meant consigning her to the streets. The hypocritical bullying of siblings hardly rises to that level of emergency.
The consequences of your other choice — sticking to “no” — are largely in your in-laws’ hands, since silent treatments cut your options nearly to nil. Your husband can certainly write each sister a heartfelt, non-angry letter, restating that your health precludes caregiving; that he stands ready to help however else he can; that he knows firsthand how difficult a time they’re all facing, Mom especially; that their volunteering him without asking first, and now shunning him, mystifies him and breaks his heart — but it’s hardly a satisfying remedy, if “remedy” even applies.
Which brings us to your mother-in-law, your only real opportunity to “handle this,” since she, apparently, will speak.
So speak he must: “Of course you’re hurt. I understand. [Wife’s] health simply won’t allow this, though. I’m stunned and saddened you were told otherwise without my knowledge.
“But that doesn’t change the fact that we need a Plan B. Are you ready to discuss one, Mom, or do you need time to think?”
You all have a right to be firm. To stand out in this crowd, though, you apparently need to be kind.