NEW YORK — The Winklevoss twins want to give investors a piece of the virtual currency Bitcoin, the growing popularity of which has caught the eye of entrepreneurs and regulators alike.
Shares in the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust “are designed for investors seeking a cost-effective and convenient means to gain exposure to bitcoins with minimal credit risk,” according to a prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission last week.
But Bitcoin, which an anonymous programmer created in 2009, has no backing of any government. The currency’s value has proved highly volatile. Exchanges on which bitcoins trade have been hacked.
So what could go wrong with the investment proposed by Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, famous for claiming they came up with the idea for Facebook?
- Seattle police officer faces firing over arrest of man carrying a golf club
- Man killed by escort had axes, shovel, bleach; may be linked to missing women
- Alaska Airlines has 72-hour sale on fall travel to Hawaii
- Seattle-area home prices hit wall in May
- Kirkland hunter defends acquaintance who killed treasured lion Cecil
Most Read Stories
Plenty, according to their securities filing. Eighteen of the filing’s 74 pages, or about 24 percent, address “risk factors” facing prospective investors.
Perhaps one of the biggest risks is how governments around the world will try to regulate the burgeoning digital currency.
In the U.S., officials have become increasingly concerned about how digital currencies in general could be used to launder money from illegal activities.
Jim Angel, a finance professor at Georgetown University, said the risk factors are “very different” from those in a typical prospectus.
“Here what you have is a speculative vehicle that is based on a digital currency of uncertain provenance and uncertain future,” Angel said.
“We have a new technology here that is untried. According to some people, it has a great deal of promise. According to some other people, it will soon be in the dustbin of history. … Time will tell which view is correct.”