Richard Fairbank may be the person most responsible for the boom in consumer debt. Teaser rates. Balance-transfer offers. Blizzards of direct-mail pitches...
Richard Fairbank may be the person most responsible for the boom in consumer debt.
Teaser rates. Balance-transfer offers. Blizzards of direct-mail pitches. Credit terms tailored toward almost anyone, regardless of financial status.
All those ideas, common now not only in the credit-card business, but also in home mortgages and other forms of consumer lending, were first put to use at the company Fairbank co-founded, Capital One Financial.
Most Read Stories
- Seattle No. 1 in home-price growth again; starter homes require half of income
- Elizabeth Warren: ‘The next step is single-payer’ health care
- Costco is testing a new burger in Seattle, and it might remind you of Shake Shack
- UW study finds Seattle’s minimum wage is costing jobs
- Zillow vs. McMansion Hell: Seattle company not backing off fight with blog despite PR fiasco
Since it was spun out of a mid-size Virginia bank in 1995, Capital One has become the nation’s second-largest independent credit-card company, and the fifth-largest overall. Capital One’s democratization of lending — the idea that almost anyone can get an unsecured loan on some terms — made it a prime mover in the rise of American consumer credit in the 1990s.
Credit-card and auto-loan debt in the United States totals more than $2 trillion, a 24 percent increase in five years that has worried consumer advocates but bolstered profits of companies like Capital One.
It earned more than $1.5 billion last year, and more than $1 billion so far this year. And it has become a household name with the help of frequent television commercials featuring comedian David Spade and a horde of barbarians lampooning its competitors.
But Fairbank is only getting started. Driven, in part, by the tapped-out credit-card market and tightening profit margins in that business, Capital One is on an ambitious and risky campaign to become a diversified, national financial-services company.
College loans, small-business loans, mortgages, home-equity loans, insurance, installment loans and auto lending figure prominently in Capital One’s future. Around the end of this month, Capital One expects to close on its purchase of Hibernia, making it the only credit-card company to purchase a major branch-banking operation.
“The leaders in any business make their moves before they have to, from a position of strength,” said Fairbank, Capital One’s chairman and chief executive. “I guess my definition of bad leadership is when one is making moves when others are making you do it. That’s why we made the decision years ago. When (stand-alone) credit-card companies were a wildly successful business model, we made a conscious choice to be more than a credit-card company.”
A surprise move
Capital One’s efforts to diversify reflect some unfavorable market realities, or, in Fairbank’s words, “absolutely inexorable trends.” Profitability has been squeezed by tough competition for customers. At the same time, borrowing costs for credit-card companies — the money borrowed from the capital markets to fund customers’ credit-card balances — have inched up along with the rise in short-term interest rates.
Over the past 20 years, financial-services companies had splintered into single-focus providers like Capital One’s credit-card operation. Now, though, consumers are showing increasing interest in bundled financial services. As with cable, phone and Internet service, the holy grail in consumer banking today is the “relationship,” in which one company can provide lending, deposit and even investment services.
While Capital One has been buying noncredit-card businesses, its chief independent competitors have gone in the opposite direction: selling out. MBNA, the largest independent credit-card issuer, and Providian Financial this summer both agreed to multibillion-dollar buyouts by major banking companies.
MBNA is going to Bank of America for $35 billion, and Providian is going to Washington Mutual for $6.45 billion. A third large independent credit-card company, Metris Companies, agreed this month to be bought by multinational bank HSBC Finance for $1.6 billion. The mergers are expected to close later this year or next, leaving Capital One alone among major credit-card issuers that are not controlled by much-larger banks.
Yet analysts expect Capital One to survive on its own.
“Fairbank is an independent-minded CEO,” said David Hendler, senior U.S. financial-services analyst at CreditSights, an independent research firm in New York. “He’s very entrepreneurial. I don’t think he’s ready to put the baby up for adoption yet.”
Edwin Groshans, who follows Capital One for Fox-Pitt, Kelton in New York, credits Capital One with recognizing two years ago that it needed not only to diversify its product offerings, but also its borrowing. One force driving independent card companies to merge with large branch banks is the banks’ access to cheaper funding sources, such as certificates of deposit, checking and savings accounts.
“They were way ahead of the curve in terms of seeing the balance-sheet problems,” Groshans said.
“The Hibernia deal is a good first step. They will now have a piece of what they need to move forward. The other credit-card companies weren’t looking to do what Capital One has done.”
Capital One is paying $5.3 billion for Hibernia. The New Orleans company has $22 billion in assets, more than 300 branches in Louisiana and Texas, and $17.1 billion of customer deposits.
Like most financial institutions, Capital One’s basic business proposition is “the spread,” the difference between what it charges its borrowers in interest and what it pays for money. As a stand-alone credit-card company, Capital One funds its customer credit-card balances through bond sales, by packaging and selling credit-card balances to investors, and by selling wholesale certificates of deposit. All those forms of funding are more expensive than bank deposits.
In its most recent quarter, Hibernia paid only 2.13 percent on average for its interest-bearing deposits, while the yield on its loans was 6.21 percent. The average cost of Capital One’s $26 billion deposits was 4.24 percent, while the yield on its loan portfolio was 12.45 percent. And so the logic of the merger: The melding of Hibernia’s much cheaper deposits with Capital One’s much higher loan yields will, over time, make the balance sheet throw off more profits.
Groshans does not think Capital One is through with bank acquisitions, either.
“Hibernia is not enough to fix their balance-sheet issues,” he said. “While we don’t think they need a national branch-bank franchise, they do need to bulk up on the retail deposits a bit more. We would not be surprised if in 2006 or 2007 they buy another bank in Texas or Florida.”
Can it be done?
Capital One is shopping for businesses that, like credit cards in the early 1990s, are highly fragmented with no dominant players. For instance, more than 93 percent of all credit-card debt at the end of 2003 was held by the top 10 largest credit-card issuers. The top 10 auto lenders, on the other hand, held only 53 percent of the market; the top 10 home-equity lenders held only 42 percent of that market.
By applying the same marketing strategies that worked so well in credit cards, Fairbank thinks Capital One, based in McLean, Va., has a shot at being a national player in such noncard businesses.
But the record of specialized financial-services companies becoming diversified, national companies is not good, according to Hendler.
“You haven’t seen a ‘monoline’ issuer become a bank and grow from there to become a national powerhouse,” he said. “They don’t have the easiest path of growth to do that. It’s an unrealistic scenario, with a low probability of success.”
Fairbank, a former strategy consultant, said he thinks Capital One has all the requisite tools to make his diversification strategy work. “I can’t prove we’re going to be different, but I’d rather be where we are than where a lot of the banks are,” he said. “I like our chances.”
Hendler added that Capital One has repeatedly proved its doubters wrong. Over the past 10 years, it has gone through regulatory problems, a chief financial officer’s insider trading, a disastrous foray into cellphones, allegations that it was charging improperly high fees, and faced cutthroat competition from card issuers who copied Capital One’s tactics.
“This is a company that has nine lives,” Hendler said. “It has hit potholes, but it has always rebounded.”