The effort to replace the Air Force's Eisenhower-era fleet of more than 500 air-refueling tankers has been fraught with controversy from the start.

Share story

The effort to replace the Air Force’s Eisenhower-era fleet of more than 500 air-refueling tankers has been fraught with controversy from the start.

2001

October: As the airline industry struggles after the Sept. 11 attacks, the Air Force proposes to lease 100 air-refueling tankers from Boeing at a cost of $20 billion or more. Sen. John McCain quickly becomes the chief critic, calling it “a sweet deal” for Boeing that would cost taxpayers more than alternative plans.

2003

This week, save 90% on digital access.

November: Boeing fires finance chief Mike Sears and Vice President Darleen Druyun after concluding Sears improperly offered her a job while she was a top Air Force acquisitions officer overseeing the tanker contract. Boeing CEO Phil Condit resigns a week later. The next spring, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld effectively scraps the tanker-leasing deal.

2005

September: After a new contract competition is announced, Northrop Grumman officially teams up with EADS — European Aeronautic Defence & Space, the parent of European plane maker Airbus — to bid against Boeing for the first 179-plane contract.

2008

January: The Airbus chief says EADS will assemble commercial jets as well as Air Force tankers in Mobile, Ala., if his team wins.

February: The Pentagon announces Northrop-EADS will build its next generation of tankers, now named the KC-45A.

March: Boeing files a protest of the Air Force contract award. Company Chairman and CEO Jim McNerney calls it “an extraordinary step rarely taken by our company.”

June: The Government Accountability Office backs Boeing’s protest, finding the Defense Department made at least seven major mistakes in the procurement process.

July 9: Defense Secretary Robert Gates says the Pentagon will rebid the tanker contract, and that his office, not the Air Force, will choose the winner.

Aug. 6: The Pentagon releases a draft request for bids to Boeing and Northrop-EADS.

Aug. 22: Boeing says it may bail out of the contest unless it gets additional time from the Pentagon to assemble its offer.

Sept. 10: The Defense Department delays the tanker competition, handing a victory to Boeing and leaving the politically charged decision for the next president.

2009

Sept. 25: The Air Force launches its third attempt to award the $35 billion tanker contract, shortly after Gates restores its authority to decide the winner.

Oct. 28: Northrop says the new request for proposals is biased toward Boeing because it prioritizes cost over expanded capabilities.

Dec. 1: Northrop warns it won’t bid unless the Pentagon’s draft request for proposals is rewritten.

2010

March 8: Northrop withdraws from the competition.

April 20: Airbus parent EADS re-enters the race, stating that its goal is to beat Boeing on price.

July 8: EADS submits bid. Boeing submits its bid the next day.

November: An Air Force mix-up releases proprietary bid information to each contender.

2011

Jan. 10: Boeing celebrates the 1,000th 767, the last before the plane’s assembly line is relocated within the Everett plant.

Jan. 27: Air Force Maj. General Wendy Masiello tells a Senate hearing that Boeing and EADS both responded “correctly and professionally” to November’s accidental release of their bid information.

Feb. 10: Both contenders submit their final bids.

Feb. 24: The Air Force awards the contract to Boeing, saying it is “a clear winner” based on price.

Source: Seattle Times archives

Custom-curated news highlights, delivered weekday mornings.