In 2016, Broadridge — a New York company that provides investor communication and other services to corporate clients — helped 154 companies conduct virtual annual meetings, an increase of 71 percent from the year before.
MINNEAPOLIS — Two years ago, SurModics conducted its annual meeting and only four shareholders showed up.
Even though it was held at the suburban Twin Cities headquarters of the company, which provides medical device and in-vitro diagnostic technologies to the health-care industry, there was not a big return for the expense.
So last year, SurModics conducted a virtual annual meeting — something more companies are electing to do. SurModic’s board chairwoman, Susan Knight, said during this year’s meeting in February that the company expects to follow suit every year.
“Quite frankly, it’s more of a social gathering than anything else,” said Andy LaFrence, chief financial officer and vice president of finance for SurModics.
Most Read Stories
- Road rage in Kent: Subaru strikes Jeep three times
- Did you get the letter? WSU sends warning to 1 million people after hard drive with personal info is stolen
- UW professor got it right on Trump. So why is he being ignored? | Danny Westneat
- The Amazon effect: Metro adds buses to handle new flock of summer interns
- Social-media speculation after Charleena Lyles shooting — and one thing people got wrong
More than 90 percent of SurModics shareholders are institutions, he said. “The majority of them are going to be on the coasts,” LaFrence said. “This gives those shareholders an opportunity to participate and to vote live with the tools in place.”
SurModics’ annual meeting was hosted by Broadridge Financial, a Long Island, New York, company that provides investor communication and other services to corporate clients.
The technology for virtual annual meetings is not much different from what is used for webcasts of a company’s quarterly investor conference call. Broadridge provides the client two specific web addresses — one to broadcast the meeting and another to cast votes.
Cathy Conlon, vice president of corporate issuer product and strategy at Broadridge Financial, sees virtual annual meetings as a trend. “This is technology that has become accepted,” she said.
Broadridge’s first virtual annual meeting was for Intel in 2009, when the Santa Clara, California-based technology company had a physical meeting with an option to participate virtually. Last year, Intel went fully virtual.
In 2016, Broadridge helped 154 companies conduct virtual annual meetings, an increase of 71 percent from the year before. Broadridge played host to 32 more hybrid models such as Intel’s 2009 meeting.
Conlon said virtual meetings are not the best solution for all companies or situations, but for some it is a cost-effective option.
Lack of attendance at physical meetings is a big reason companies, especially smaller ones, are moving toward the virtual route. Virtual options also can increase participation, especially with the growth of institutional owners.
Institutional owners are not likely to be in the same cities as the companies in which they invest, and during the first several months of the year — the big annual-meeting season — they can’t physically attend all meetings.
The actual business being undertaken at most annual meetings is very limited. SurModics’ virtual meeting was 18 minutes, with the essential business actions taking five minutes.
The business at hand typically means electing directors, voting on CEO compensation plans, ratifying company auditors and voting on any special shareholder proposals.
“I think very few companies and very few shareholders would say that they view the annual meeting as being a forum for getting information about the company,” said Amy Seidel, a partner in the Minneapolis law office of Faegre Baker Daniel who advises public companies. The first-quarter earnings releases are usually timed better for those updates.
However, there are critics who say the face time with executives at physical annual meetings is important. Among them is the nation’s largest pension fund, California Public Employees’ Retirement System, or CalPERS, which has in its 2015 statement of investment policy that companies should only include a virtual option as a supplement to in-person meetings.
The Council for Institutional Investors, a nonprofit association for corporate, public and union employee benefit funds and endowments, has a similar policy.