A news agency's fight with the popular search engine is a test of what constitutes "fair use" of copyright material circulated online.
NEW YORK — In a case that could set limits on Internet search engines, the French news agency Agence France-Presse (AFP) is suing Google for pulling together photos and story excerpts from thousands of news Web sites.
AFP said the “Google News” service infringes on AFP’s copyrights by reproducing information from the Web sites of subscribers to the Paris-based news wholesaler.
The issues raised by the case have profound implications for the Internet, where anyone can be a publisher and Web journals, or blogs, are becoming more frequent destinations for news seekers.
Most Read Stories
- Submarines dismantled in Puget Sound are symbols of nation’s defense dilemma | Jon Talton
- Democrats are supposed to be fighting back, but they just keep losing | Danny Westneat
- Seattle Zestimates are off by $40,000; now hundreds of data crunchers vie to improve Zillow’s model
- Spike Lee posts, then deletes photo thanking Seahawks' Pete Carroll for signing Colin Kaepernick
- Police: Man hurling racial slurs kills 2, injures 1 on train
The lawsuit’s outcome will likely hinge on whether Google can persuade the courts that Google News constitutes permissible “fair use” of copyright material.
Legal scholars say Google could argue it adds value by significantly improving the news-consuming experience without greatly harming AFP’s ability to sell its service.
But in seeking at least $17.5 million in damages, AFP says Google adds little because its news site looks much like those of AFP subscribers, albeit one where software and not human editors determine the placement of stories on a page.
The U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., where the lawsuit was filed Thursday, will ultimately have to balance search engines’ desire to give consumers convenience, selling ads in the process, and copyright owners’ rights to control their works.
“The story [of the Internet] from Day One has been one of waves of liberalization followed by attempts at control,” said Jonathan Zittrain, a Harvard law professor. “It’s rightly up to the courts and the government to figure out where the lines should be drawn.”
It’s possible, though, for the courts to skirt key issues, given Google’s promise this week to remove the AFP items in question, though technically that’s not something that can be done overnight.
AFP lawyer Joshua Kaufman said the lawsuit would nevertheless proceed because damage has been done.
Google News, which debuted in 2002, scans some 4,500 news outlets and highlights the top stories under common categories such as world and sports.
Many stories carry a small image, or thumbnail, along with the headline and the first sentence or two. Visitors can click on the headline to read the full story at the source’s Web site.
Yahoo! has a similar service, though it uses human editors and pays some news sources, including AFP and The Associated Press, for rights. (Google wouldn’t comment on any similar financial arrangements.)
In a statement, Google spokesman Steve Langdon said Web sites can request removal, adding that most “want to be included in Google News because they believe it is a benefit to them and their readers.”
AFP’s own Web site includes a “robots.txt” file that spurns search engines, essentially telling them to avoid indexing its news pages.
But the case is complicated by the fact stories come not directly from AFP but from its subscribers, some of which might want their sites indexed to generate ad-boosting referrals.
The fair-use argument will likely draw upon a 2002 appeals court ruling that thumbnail images serve a different, transformative function as compared with full-size originals.
But Charles Ossola, who handled that appeal on behalf of the copyright holder, said that ruling may not apply to the use of text, given that summaries can be rewritten for search purposes whereas images cannot.
A 1985 Supreme Court ruling on a non-Internet copyright dispute found that small excerpts can constitute infringement if they represent the heart of the work. AFP argues that the headline and first sentence of a story do just that.
“They capture the reader’s attention and describe what the rest of the article is about,” the lawsuit said.
Associated Press spokesman Jack Stokes came out in AFP’s support, issuing a statement that AP believes “intellectual-property laws protect news. That protection is important to ensure that organizations such as the AP can afford to collect news.”
That said, facts cannot be copyrighted, and Google may have a claim on such citations if they are mostly based on facts not expression, said Fred von Lohmann, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a civil-liberties group in San Francisco.
Von Lohmann said a ruling against Google also could harm the free exchange of ideas on blogs, which often cite and link to news stories.
The AFP case is not the only lawsuit challenging a search engine’s practices. A Web site that sells nude photos of women has sued Google, accusing it of distributing links and passwords. Several companies also have sued Google and others over the use of trademarks as keywords for triggering a rival’s ads.
“They are becoming multimedia centers rather than simply indexing information for consumers,” said Ossola, who represents insurer Geico in one such trademark case against Google.
“The argument of convenience and benefits to consumers only goes so far when it runs into what are the legitimate rights” of intellectual-property owners, Ossola said.