Twenty years ago I wrote a column predicting 1985 would be a very good year for stocks. My analysis was basic. Interest rates were likely to continue falling. As a consequence, investors...
Twenty years ago I wrote a column predicting 1985 would be a very good year for stocks.
My analysis was basic. Interest rates were likely to continue falling. As a consequence, investors would be willing to pay more for a dollar of earnings.
That meant price-to-earnings multiples could rise even if earnings didn’t rise. Investors would enjoy price appreciation through P/E-multiple expansion.
Most Read Stories
- Christopher Monfort, killer of Seattle police officer, found dead in prison cell
- Why are home prices so high? Seattle has 2nd-lowest rate of homes for sale in U.S.
- 50,000 expected to attend Seattle women’s march day after Trump inauguration WATCH
- What you need to know about Inauguration Day protests, events in Seattle
- 3 Seattle restaurants that make you feel like you’re far, far away VIEW
And that’s what happened.
The total return on the S&P 500 stocks in 1985 was an outsized 32.2 percent. It was followed by an 18.5 percent total return in 1986.
While many investors don’t remember what 1985 felt like, stocks had tough competition from bonds and certificates of deposit.
Although interest rates had peaked several years earlier, short-term U.S. Treasury obligations were yielding 9 percent. Quality long-term bonds were yielding about 12 percent.
Since the historical average return on stocks was 10 to 11 percent, many investors preferred the safety of bonds and CDs.
Few wanted the uncertainty of stock returns. Stocks were cheap — but most people were afraid to buy.
Today the situation is reversed.
Bond yields are low. Short-term Treasury obligations earn less than 2.5 percent. Long-term Treasurys earn less than 5 percent.
According to the Leuthold Group in Minneapolis, these yields rank in the bottom 10 and 30 percent of all quarterly time periods since 1957, respectively.
Today, if interest rates rise, stocks will face increasing competition from bonds and certificates of deposit. If the decline in interest rates is over, stock P/E ratios are likely to shrink.
The higher bond yields go, the less investors will be willing to pay for a dollar of earnings. We may be at the beginning of a long P/E-multiple decline.
Some, but not all, of the decline can be offset by rising earnings. The important thing to remember, however, is that earnings multiples are likely to shrink, not expand.
You can understand the impact of bond competition by using one of the many models for valuing common stocks. The Goldman Sachs model, used in my column 20 years ago, assumes that investors demand a return on their stock investments that is equal to the yield on a bond plus a risk premium.
If bonds are yielding 5 percent today and the risk premium is 5 percentage points — a total return of 10 percent — stocks would have to be priced to provide that return from growth in book value and the dividend yield.
In fact, the algebra nearly blows up in the current market. With a return on shareholder equity of nearly 13 percent for the S&P 500 index companies and 70 percent of earnings retained, stocks need a dividend yield of only 0.9 percent to provide a 10 percent annual return.
Since the current market yields about 1.7 percent, stocks appear to be undervalued by this measure.
Needless to say, other models and other indicators don’t agree.
What’s important, however, is to see the impact of rising interest rates. If interest rates are 5 percent, the model says we can pay 33 times earnings for the S&P 500.
But if rates rise to 6 percent, the same model says we can pay only 16 times earnings. It indicates only 10 times earnings for 7 percent bond yields and eight times earnings for 8 percent bond yields — about where stocks were priced at the 1982 market low.
In fact, Standard & Poor’s estimates 2005 earnings for the S&P 500 at $74, which gives a future P/E of 16, compared to the current multiple of 18.
What does that mean for you and me as investors?
Two things. First, valuations are likely to be reasonable in 2005 even if long-term interest rates climb to 6 percent. If interest rates remain the same, 2005 could be another good year for the U.S. stock market.
Second, the caution light is on. We need to watch interest rates very, very carefully.
Questions about personal finance and investments may be sent to Scott Burns at The Dallas Morning News, P.O. Box 655237, Dallas, TX 75265; by fax at 214-977-8776; or by e-mail at email@example.com. Questions of general interest will be answered in future columns.