Google's privacy practices are the worst among the Internet's top destinations, according to a watchdog group seeking to intensify the recent...
SAN FRANCISCO — Google’s privacy practices are the worst among the Internet’s top destinations, according to a watchdog group seeking to intensify the recent focus on how the online-search leader handles personal information about its users.
In a report released Saturday, London-based Privacy International assigned Google its lowest possible grade.
The category is reserved for companies with “comprehensive consumer surveillance and entrenched hostility to privacy.”
None of the 22 other surveyed companies — including Yahoo!, Microsoft and AOL — were rated at that level, according to Privacy International.
- Live updates from May Day in Seattle: Anti-capitalist protesters clash with police
- Good news about coconut oil, melatonin and turmeric
- Visitors trash Washington island, so officials shut it down for good
- Oregon QB Vernon Adams to attend Seahawks rookie mini-camp on a tryout basis
- Pro Football Focus breaks down the final five Seahawks' draft picks
Most Read Stories
While some other Internet companies have troubling policies, none comes as close to Google to “achieving status as an endemic threat to privacy,” Privacy International said.
Seven of the Internet companies and Web sites included in Privacy International’s analysis received the second-lowest grade of “substantial and comprehensive privacy threats.” This group included: Time Warner’s AOL, Apple, Facebook.com, Hi5.com, Reunion.com, Microsoft’s Windows Live Space and Yahoo!.
Privacy International, founded in 1990, bills itself as a human-rights watchdog on surveillance and privacy invasions by governments and corporations. The group said it reached its preliminary findings after spending the past six months reviewing Internet privacy practices with the help of about 30 professors, mostly in the United States and United Kingdom. The group plans to update the report in September.
The Associated Press
A Google lawyer said the company aggressively protects its users’ privacy and stands behind its track record. In its most conspicuous defense of user privacy, Google last year successfully fought a U.S. Justice Department subpoena demanding to review millions of search requests.
“We are disappointed with Privacy International’s report, which is based on numerous inaccuracies and misunderstandings about our services,” said Nicole Wong, Google’s deputy general counsel.
“It’s a shame that Privacy International decided to publish its report before we had an opportunity to discuss our privacy practices with them.”
Privacy International contacted Google earlier this month but didn’t receive a response, said Simon Davies, the group’s director.
The group is particularly troubled by Google’s ability to match data gathered by its search engine with information collected from other services such as e-mail, instant messaging and maps.
“Under the microscope, it turns out that Google is doing much more with our data than we ever imagined,” Davies said.
The report is the most recent strike aimed at Google’s privacy practices.
An independent European panel recently opened an inquiry into whether Google’s policies abide by Europe’s privacy rules.
Meanwhile, three consumer groups in the United States are pressuring the nation’s regulators to make Google change some of its privacy policies as part of its proposed $3.1 billion acquisition of online ad service DoubleClick, which also tracks Web surfers’ behavior.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is looking into antitrust concerns raised by the DoubleClick deal but has not indicated if privacy will be part of the inquiry.
Hoping to placate critics, Google has pledged to begin erasing information about users’ search requests within 18 to 24 months.
The company says it stockpiles data to help its search engine better understand users so it can deliver more relevant results and advertisements.
As Google becomes more knowledgeable about the people relying on its search engine and other free services, management hopes to develop more tools that recommend activities and other pursuits that might appeal to individual users.