Feeling "motivated" to sell your house? It might be best to keep that feeling under wraps, or at least out of the ad.
Words matter. Wars have started over them. Civilizations have collapsed because of them. And it appears the speed with which a house sells might be determined by them.
As listings grow old on the vine in this flush-with-inventory market and frustrated sellers reach for the slightest edge, the findings of several academics might offer guidance.
For example, a Canadian professor, as part of a broader study on real-estate sales patterns, found that homes where the seller was “motivated” took 15 percent longer to sell, while houses listed as “handyman specials” flew off the market in half the average time. “It surprised even me,” said researcher Paul Anglin, who teaches real-estate and housing trends at the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada. The study dissected the wording of more than 20,000 Canadian home listings from 1997 to 2000.
What surprised him most was how the buying public put style over substance. Words that denoted “curb appeal” or general attractiveness helped a property sell faster than those that spoke of “value” and “price.”
- Husky guide on UW cheerleading tryouts goes global
- Look like this, not that: UW pulls cheerleader-tryout advice after angry backlash
- CEO makes fiery emails about Muslims part of the workday
- Seahawks take Germain Ifedi with first-round pick in NFL draft
- APNewsBreak: Investigators look at overdose in Prince death
Most Read Stories
Homes described as “beautiful” moved 15 percent faster and for 5 percent more in price than the benchmark. “Good-value” homes sold for 5 percent less than average.
Another finding in Anglin’s study was that the plea of “must see!” was received about as enthusiastically as a dinner-time telemarketing call. Using “must see” had a statistically insignificant effect on the number of days homes took to sell.
Words that help sell a home:
Words that hurt:
Los Angeles Times
Listings where “landscaping” was heralded sold 20 percent faster, and homes in “move-in condition” took 12 percent less time to sell than the benchmark, although the study showed that “move-in condition” had an insignificant effect on the sales price.
Owners use listing language to convey how serious they are about selling. Some words work better than others, Anglin’s study found. Listings in which the seller said he or she was “moving” sold for 1 percent less compared with 8 percent less when the seller was “motivated.”
Real-estate listings, not unlike personal ads, are crafted to minimize blemishes and maximize perceived selling points. So if “enjoys moonlight walks on the beach and cooking together” means “I’m unemployed and am looking for someone who won’t always expect to eat out,” then “needs TLC” might mean “this house will have you on a first-name basis with the clerks at the local hardware store.”
Anglin’s study isn’t alone in its attempt to determine what language moves the market.
Last year, the effect of listing language was covered in a National Bureau of Economic Research study that looked at whether real-estate agents selling their own homes hold out for a higher price. (They do; the study found they take longer to sell but fetch a higher price.)
Descriptions of houses that indicated an obvious problem — such as “foreclosure,” “as-is” and “handyman special” — drew substantially lower sale prices.
Words that suggested desirable attributes — “granite,” “maple,” “gourmet” — translated into a higher sale price, the study found.
One problem discovered was that “superficially positive” words that, in effect, damn with faint praise — such as “clean” or “quiet” — had zero or even a negative correlation with prices.
Those findings echo those made in a 2000 paper, “Real Estate Agent Remarks: Help or Hype?”, researched by University of Texas finance and real-estate professor Ronald Rutherford.
Rutherford found, among other things, that buyers read between the lines. If you can’t find anything better to say than “new paint,” perhaps it’s best to say nothing at all.
Positive and factually verifiable comments such as “golf” or “lake” drew increased sales prices. Other presumably positive comments regarding new paint or new carpet brought lower ones.
“What you say needs to be extravagant, or the signal that is received by buyers is that it’s not worth talking about,” Rutherford said.
But what do sellers know? “New paint” appeared on 15 percent of the listings and was the most commonly listed comment.
Rutherford said sellers would be best-served by a listing with “just the facts, ma’am.”
“In today’s market, if it’s a good deal, you need to convey it with factually verifiable language,” Rutherford said.
An example: “Needs repairs.”
Of the information from his study, conducted between 1994 and 1997 of almost 60,000 closed residential transactions in Tarrant County, Texas, what surprised him most?
That homes with “motivated” sellers stayed on the market 15 percent longer than average and sold for 4 percent less.
His theory: “They overpriced the house to start with and eventually had to lower it. That explains the length of time on the market and the lower sales price.”
Does he have any advice for today’s sellers?
“Yes,” he said. “Avoid the word ‘motivated.’ “