Two federal programs. Two sets of guidelines, protocols.
If you’re a victim of banking abuses during the foreclosure crisis, the government says it will make sure you receive compensation from your bank. It’s a simple idea. But for victims, determining who’s eligible, how to apply, and when you might get a check in the mail isn’t simple at all.
There are two separate government efforts: the National Mortgage Settlement and the Independent Foreclosure Review.
While both share the goal of providing some compensation to homeowners who were harmed by their banks’ abuses or errors, the two have very different approaches.
The National Mortgage Settlement is a deal struck by attorneys general from 49 states and the federal government with five of the biggest banks, and it takes a pragmatic approach.
- Man shot dead in South Seattle while on phone with mom
- Seattle company copes with backlash on $70,000 minimum wage
- Impressions from Day 2 of Seahawks' training camp
- Seahawks sign four-year extension with linebacker Bobby Wagner worth a reported $43 million
- Higher wages a surprising success for Seattle restaurant Ivar's
Most Read Stories
Instead of trying to calibrate compensation to how bad each homeowner was harmed, officials opted instead for a one-size-fits-all solution. Everyone who qualifies for compensation will get the same amount of money. And the paperwork will be minimal: Homeowners will only have to check a box saying they were harmed.
Even with this simplified process, it will take months before people can expect to see the check in the mail. The best guess now is in the first three months of 2013.
And the check, critics contend, will be small. Exactly how much each homeowner will get depends on how many people claim they were harmed. Officials in charge of the settlement have estimated that 750,000 people will respond, and since $1.5 billion has been set aside, that means each victim would receive about $2,000.
If only 500,000 people responded, the payments would jump to $3,000. If a million responded, the payments would drop to $1,500.
Independent Foreclosure Review is much more complicated. Conceived and overseen by federal banking regulators, the review aims to calculate each homeowner’s exact “financial injury.”
The effort got under way last November when 4.4 million letters went out to homeowners. As of May 24, fewer than 200,000 homeowners had replied, a response rate of just 4.5 percent, according to regulators. Homeowners have until Sept. 30.
You can get a hard copy of the Request for Review Form two different ways. First, you might have received a letter from your servicer with the form included. Those letters were mailed out sometime before the end of 2011.
If for some reason you haven’t received one, you can also request a form by calling 888-952-9105 (Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. or Saturday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern time). The form will have a “control number” specific to your individual case.
You can also submit your application through the Independent Foreclosure Review website.
The response is underwhelming. Housing counselors say a major reason is that homeowners are confused by the forms. The mailing was a four-page questionnaire called a “Request for Review Form” that contains 13 questions, some of them specific and technical, such as: “Do you believe you were protected by an insurance policy issued by the servicer or an affiliate that would have made your payments in the event of unemployment, disability, or illness, but did not do so?”
Many homeowners thought the letter was a scam, didn’t know how to fill it out, or didn’t understand what they stood to gain from filling it out, according to a recent survey of counselors by the California Reinvestment Coalition.
The form is crucial; if a homeowner doesn’t send it in, there is no guarantee his case will be reviewed.
Many aspects of the Independent Foreclosure Review aren’t transparent. While some details have been released — such as which companies have been hired to conduct the reviews — other key details remain secret. In particular, regulators still haven’t released how they will calculate “financial injury.”
Even the form of compensation — cash or something else — remains unclear. An example of noncash compensation, said Hubbard, could be repairing a borrower’s credit report. Hubbard said regulators are developing answers to these questions, but it’s not clear when they will release them, let alone when homeowners can expect to receive any kind of compensation.
The Office of Comptroller and Currency, the primary regulator for the largest banks, has made one major determination: Homeowners will not be asked to waive any legal rights in return for compensation, Hubbard said.