The National Labor Relations Board is unlikely to take action before Jan. 3 on a charge by a Machinist that the union’s national leadership is trying to shape the outcome of a vote on the hotly debated Boeing contract offer by scheduling the balloting for that day.
“The investigation would more than likely not be completed before then,” said Brian Sweeney, deputy regional attorney for the NLRB in Seattle.
The charge, which was received by the board Monday, “will be assigned to a board agent and that agent will conduct an investigation,” he said.
“Typically, on a charge of this nature an investigation wouldn’t be done until mid-February.”
- WSU study: 'Exploding head syndrome' more common than once thought
- Oregon Zoo elephant Rama euthanized; loved to paint
- Ivar's to raise restaurant workers' wages to $15 right away
- Orca baby boom continues with discovery of fourth calf
- Bertha's damaged cutter head emerges from pit
Most Read Stories
The complaint, filed by union member Robley Evans, a vice president in the union’s Local F unit who works in Auburn, asks the board to seek an injunction to delay the vote.
It says the union is not providing members “a reasonable opportunity to vote” because many will still be on vacation after the company’s annual holiday leave.
The International Association of Machinists’ national leadership announced Saturday it was ordering a vote Jan. 3 by members in Seattle, Portland and Wichita on a revised contract extension offer by Boeing.
Boeing says it will build the planned 777X in its Puget Sound plants if the contract is approved, but otherwise will look at other sites.
Local Machinist leaders have adamantly opposed such a vote, arguing the offer is not much of an improvement over the one union members soundly rejected Nov. 13.
The new offer, which extends the current contract from 2016 to 2024, eliminates Boeing’s proposal to lengthen to 16-plus years, from six, the so-called “zoom” period for moving to the top pay for a particular job classification.
But it retains Boeing’s insistence on stopping accumulations in the Machinists’ longstanding pension plan in 2016 and starting a defined-contribution retirement savings plan instead.
Many Machinists have complained that a Jan. 3 vote coincides with their vacation plans — though it’s not clear whether that would favor one side or the other.
The local union leadership said on its website Monday that it had the national union’s approval to allow absentee voting, unlike for its previous elections.
The national union leadership has not confirmed that, or explained why it scheduled the vote for Jan. 3.
In investigating any charge, Sweeney said, an NLRB agent must gather evidence from both sides and contact witnesses when a charge is filed.
The agent would then advise the regional director on the charge’s merit, and if the issue hasn’t already been resolved and can’t be settled, the board can issue a complaint that will be dealt with in a hearing before an administrative-law judge.
The NLRB can adjudicate disputes between members and their unions just as it does disputes between organized workers and their employers, said Sweeney.