The U.S. Government Accountability Office on Thursday urged more transparency in the debit-card system used to electronically disburse college students’ financial aid and said that transaction fees for the cards quickly add up.
In a report, the GAO said that the use of debit cards has risen in the past decade. Though only 11 percent of schools in the U.S. have contracts with companies to offer the debit cards, the 852 schools that do are disproportionately large, accounting for 40 percent of U.S. college enrollment, according to the GAO.
Congressional investigators said that though fees on the debit cards are comparable to conventional bank-issued cards, two large companies charge fees for purchases made using a personal identification number, or PIN. Those charges can quickly accumulate.
“No basic or student account that we reviewed for comparison purposes charged a transaction fee for using the account’s debit card,” the report said. The GAO said that about a third of all PIN transactions are for amounts less than $15, which can make a 50-cent fee an expensive addition.
- Tourists robbed, beaten downtown ‘afraid to go back’ to Seattle
- Animated map: How the wildfires in North Central Washington have grown over time
- Steve Sarkisian was reimbursed by Washington for hefty alcohol bills
- Seahawks safety Kam Chancellor holdout FAQ
- Why did the Mariners’ season go terribly wrong?
Most Read Stories
The report also urged the Department of Education to draw up requirements that would make agreements between colleges and card companies more transparent.
The GAO highlighted conflicts of interest that may exist when colleges provide information to students about debit-card options.
“Schools may have incentives to influence student choice because some receive payments from card providers based on the number of card accounts or transactions, leading some consumer advocates to question whether schools always act in their students’ best interests,” the report said. “Furthermore, the contracts between schools and card providers are not publicly available and data on these cards are limited.”
The report said that while some schools have revenue-sharing agreements — where the school receives a payment based on the number of accounts opened or other parameters — the number of these arrangements appeared to be declining.
Colleges have opted to contract with companies to offer electronic options to disperse funds, the report said. The move often results in lower administrative costs associated with processing paper checks, which is partly why an increasing number of schools have moved toward these types of contracts.
One company, Higher One Holdings, accounts for 57 percent of the college debit-card market, congressional investigators said. Other financial firms that offer the services include U.S. Bank and Wells Fargo, but other competitors’ market share ranges from 2 percent to as much as 10 percent.
Higher One has seen strong growth in recent years. For 2012, the New Haven, Conn.-based company reported a profit of $36.9 million, the GAO said. Nearly 80 percent of its 2012 revenue came from accounts opened by students and other college community members.
Higher One, which ended revenue-sharing agreements in 2007 and has sought to end those arrangements in existing contracts, said it has made “considerable changes to ensure our student account offerings are fair, valuable, fully transparent,” according to a statement from Casey McGuane, the company’s chief operating officer.