A federal judge heard arguments yesterday in a trademark dispute that could threaten millions in advertising revenue for search engine Google. Attorneys for auto-insurance giant...
ALEXANDRIA, Va. A federal judge heard arguments yesterday in a trademark dispute that could threaten millions in advertising revenue for search engine Google.
Attorneys for auto-insurance giant Geico told U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema that Google should not be allowed to sell ads to rival insurance companies that are triggered whenever Geico’s name is typed into the Google search box.
Most Read Stories
- No more flying with reindeer: Unique Alaska planes to retire VIEW
- ‘No more agriculture in Puerto Rico,’ a farmer laments
- Seattle to spend $177M on new streetcar line amid questions about ‘unrealistic’ revenue, rider projections
- McCain calls brain cancer prognosis 'very poor'
- A daring betrayal helped wipe out Cali cocaine cartel
Geico claims that Google’s AdWords program, which displays the rival ads under a “Sponsored Links” heading next to a user’s search results, causes confusion for consumers and illegally exploits Geico’s investment of hundreds of millions of dollars in its brand.
“When a consumers enters ‘Geico’ … and goes to the sponsored link believing there’s a connection, that is where the confusion arises,” said Geico attorney Charles Ossola.
But Google attorney Michael Page said the ad policy is no different than a supermarket giving out coupons for one product in the checkout line when a customer buys the same product from a different company.
“There is nothing wrong with that under the trademark laws,” Page said.
Geico filed the lawsuit against Google in May, seeking $8.65 million in lost profits and a court order preventing Google from using its name in the advertising program.
Under the program, for example, a competing insurance company could bid to have its ad appear every time Google users search for the word “Geico.” When a user clicks on an ad, the advertiser pays Google a predetermined fee.
Google is facing similar lawsuits from other companies, including American Blind and Wallpaper Factory and AXA, the world’s No. 3 insurer. Last year, Google asked a court to rule on whether its pay-for-placement ad policy is legal.