Federal regulators investigating the accounting of embattled Fannie Mae have discovered additional serious problems.
WASHINGTON — Federal regulators investigating the accounting of embattled Fannie Mae have discovered additional serious problems, the mortgage giant disclosed yesterday, as it received a three-month extension for boosting its capital cushion against risk.
The biggest U.S. buyer of home mortgages has been reducing its portfolio of home loans even faster than expected as it prepared to meet the regulators’ original June deadline for a $5 billion capital boost.
An eight-month investigation by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), which supervises Fannie Mae, last year found serious accounting problems at the government-sponsored company as well as a pervasive pattern of earnings manipulation and lax internal controls. The Securities and Exchange Commission ordered Fannie Mae in December to restate its earnings back to 2001, a correction estimated at $9 billion. The company’s chief executive, Franklin Raines, and chief financial officer, Timothy Howard, were forced out by the board of directors.
Most Read Stories
- Friends honor artist’s last wishes with water ballet in a Seattle kiddie pool WATCH
- Battling demons in a community looking to Trump for change VIEW
- Your guide to enjoying the eclipse from Seattle
- Conspiracy monger Alex Jones roams Seattle streets, gets coffee dumped on him
- Experts answer your burning questions about the 2017 solar eclipse
Now OFHEO, whose examination continues, has informed Fannie Mae’s board of additional problems including accounting for securities and loans, and practices to spread the impact of income and expenses over time, the company said in a statement. It said the agency had identified internal-control deficiencies at the company “that it believes raise safety and soundness concerns.”
Fannie Mae shares, which have been battered in the weeks since its accounting crisis came to light on Sept. 22, fell 64 cents to close at $57.16, their lowest level in more than four years and 30 percent below their high of $80.82 a year ago.
“We’re getting a broader, more detailed understanding of the specific accounting issues, but I don’t see this as anything new,” said Bert Ely, a banking consultant in Alexandria, Va., and longtime critic of Fannie Mae.
In its statement, the company said its board and management “are addressing the issues and questions.”
“Fannie Mae will report to OFHEO regarding each of these issues, and will continue to work with OFHEO to resolve these matters as part of the company’s ongoing internal reviews and its restatement process,” it said.
In September, the regulators ordered Fannie Mae to boost its capital cushion against risk by 30 percent, or some $5 billion, by the middle of this year.
The company said yesterday that the agency had extended that deadline until Sept. 30.
OFHEO spokeswoman Corinne Russell declined comment.
Washington-based Fannie Mae has been shrinking its loan portfolio even faster than expected as it prepared to meet the original June deadline. Its spectacular growth of recent years could be curtailed.
The company said Monday that its gross portfolio, which includes both its own investments and mortgage-backed securities it guarantees that are held by other investors, fell to $890 billion at the end of January from $904.6 billion in December, for an annualized rate of decline of 16.8 percent.
By comparison, Fannie Mae’s mortgage portfolio fell at an annualized rate of 10.1 percent in December, bringing growth for 2004 as a whole to 0.7 percent, compared with 2003’s 13.1 percent pace.
In recent weeks the company also has raised fresh capital by issuing some $5 billion in preferred stock and slashed its first-quarter dividend payout by half, to 26 cents a share, to make up its anticipated shortfall.
To cut costs, Fannie Mae last month stopped awarding stock options to senior managers. As further cost-cutting measures, the politically influential company disclosed yesterday that it will “sharply curtail its corporate advertising campaign and use of political consultants.”
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, its smaller rival in the $8 trillion home-mortgage market, have wielded influence in Congress and traditionally have been heavy contributors to lawmakers of both parties. The accounting crisis at Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac’s disclosure in June 2003 that it had understated profits by some $4.5 billion for 2000-2002 in an effort to smooth earnings, have bolstered calls by lawmakers and government officials for tighter regulation of the two and curtailment of their privileges.
On Tuesday, OFHEO said it had proposed requiring Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to promptly report mortgage fraud or suspected fraud to the government and to establish internal controls to detect it. The action followed the alleged defrauding of U.S. housing finance agency Ginnie Mae.
In addition, OFHEO Director Armando Falcon ordered Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to notify the agency of any government investigations or civil or criminal actions, or lawsuits by private parties such as shareholders.
The two companies, created by Congress, pump money into the home-mortgage market by buying and guaranteeing repayment of billions of dollars of home loans each year from banks and other lenders, then bundling them into securities that are resold to investors worldwide.