WASHINGTON — The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published a plan Thursday that sets the stage for law-enforcement agencies, businesses, universities and hobbyists to begin flying remotely piloted aircraft, better known as drones, in the United States by 2015.
Twenty-four states — including Washington — have applied to host the testing sites, but the FAA has yet to determine where they will be located.
The 74-page plan immediately drew flak from some privacy advocates, who say that the FAA needs to clarify how the government and private users can use video and other data from surveillance drones, and how long it can be stored.
“As far as commercially flying these things, I think we are still two years away from that,” said Ben Gielow, government-relations manager for the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, an industry group. The new plan “is a big step for FAA to make, but clearly, more needs to be done,” Gielow said.
- WSU study: 'Exploding head syndrome' more common than once thought
- Ivar's to raise restaurant workers' wages to $15 right away
- Opening day roster looks pretty clear after Sunday cuts
- A mom's tweet about Oreos in school stirs up culture wars
- 3 places off the beaten track in Hawaii
Most Read Stories
FAA Administrator Michael Huerta estimated that 7,500 small drones could be aloft within five years if federal regulations are written on schedule. He said the chief concern is requiring drone designs and pilot training to help prevent unmanned planes from colliding with other aircraft.
“We have operational goals and safety issues we need to consider as we expand the use of unmanned aircraft,” Huerta told an aerospace conference Thursday at a hotel in Washington, D.C.
More than 80 law-enforcement agencies have FAA permission to fly drones, and universities are testing drones for weather forecasting and agricultural and industrial uses.
By the end of this year, the FAA is scheduled to choose test sites in six states where manufacturers can bring drones for evaluation by federal safety experts, Huerta said.
According to the FAA, the state governments or universities that oversee the test sites must describe their policies for privacy, data use and data retention. The document released Thursday did not set those policies, but said drone operators must “comply with federal, state and other laws on individual privacy protection.”
Ryan Calo, who teaches robotics law at the University of Washington School of Law, said the document shows that FAA officials are at least considering privacy concerns.
“Here they are taking a different tack and embracing the idea that privacy is a necessary consideration,” Calo said in a telephone interview. “That is part of a change from when they were saying, ‘We are not about privacy. We are really all about safety.’ ”
Christopher Calabrese, legislative counsel with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), said the FAA needed to expand privacy requirements to include “concrete restrictions on how data from drones can be used and how long it can be stored.”
The ACLU has urged Congress to support laws introduced in the House and the Senate that would require police to get judicial approval before using a drone.
Under a law passed in 2012, the FAA must provide for the “safe integration” of commercial drones into domestic airspace by 2015. But the agency has missed several deadlines. Safety rules for small drones won’t be issued before 2014, for example, three years behind schedule.
Until regulations establish who can fly a drone and where, Huerta said, the FAA will license drone operators on a case-by-case basis.