Confronted with deteriorating finances at WorldCom, Chief Executive Bernard Ebbers repeatedly insisted the company had to "hit our numbers," former CFO said.
NEW YORK — Confronted with deteriorating finances at WorldCom, Chief Executive Bernard Ebbers repeatedly insisted the company had to “hit our numbers,” the former chief financial officer testified yesterday.
Scott Sullivan told jurors at Ebbers’ fraud trial he told the CEO in the fall of 2000 that it could only meet Wall Street expectations by booking improper figures to boost revenue and hide expenses.
“I told Bernie, ‘This isn’t right,’ ” Sullivan said, describing a meeting that October in which he showed Ebbers a plan to create $133 million in revenue by improperly drawing down reserve accounts.
Most Read Stories
- Seattle just broke a 122-year-old record for rain — because of course it did
- Seattle area home-price hikes lead the U.S. again; even century-old homes commanding top dollar
- Texas football player’s story prompts probe of Garfield High School recruitment
- Lawyers for Mayor Ed Murray seeking sanctions against attorney for sex-assault accuser
- Girl, 17, linked to Seattle police shooting charged as an adult
“He just stared at it, and he looked up at me and he said, ‘We have to hit our numbers,’ ” Sullivan testified.
The government contends the remark was a command from Ebbers for Sullivan and WorldCom accountants to commit a fraud that eventually grew to $11 billion and drove the telecommunications firm into bankruptcy in 2002.
Two accountants have testified they threatened to quit in October 2000, and Sullivan testified he sent a handwritten note to Ebbers complaining there was no support for the adjustments.
Sullivan said Ebbers later told him: “We shouldn’t be making these people make these adjustments.”
Sullivan, the government’s star witness and the only one to directly link Ebbers to the fraud, has pleaded guilty in the scandal. On his second day of testimony, he walked jurors through late 2000, when WorldCom’s business was suffering mightily.
At the time, the dot-com bubble had burst. WorldCom was faced with sharply slowing revenue growth and expenses that soared so high that Sullivan said he thought there was something wrong with the numbers.
Sullivan said he told Ebbers that WorldCom had to issue a revenue-growth projection for 2001 of 9 to 10 percent, and 12 percent at most. He said Ebbers balked.
“Bernie said, ’12 percent? This is a growth company, WorldCom Group. We’ve got to be focused at 15 percent growth.’ ” Days later, it projected 12 to 15 percent growth.
Prosecutors have said Ebbers orchestrated the conspiracy because he was obsessed with keeping WorldCom’s stock price high, partly to protect $400 million in personal loans backed by the stock.
Sullivan testified that in September 2000, Ebbers complained about margin calls on his loans from the bank, which was seeking additional collateral because WorldCom stock was falling.
“He said he was receiving margin calls from Bank of America, and they were screwing him,” Sullivan said.
Sullivan also said Ebbers twice rejected lowering third-quarter projections in 2000, first saying WorldCom could not do it without explaining the circumstances and then saying the company could wait to lower forecast until the next quarter.
The former CFO said Ebbers regularly pressured him to meet revenue and earnings targets to please Wall Street. “The source of the pressure was Bernie, and the source of the pressure was also the marketplace,” Sullivan said.
Sullivan said WorldCom adjusted some of its revenue figures, such as credits for overbilling, with the goal of meeting Wall Street analysts’ growth expectations.
He testified he presented monthly revenue reports to Ebbers in mid-2000, and Ebbers used phrases like, “This is horrible, this is terrible results.”
Ebbers is accused of fraud, conspiracy and submitting false filings to the Securities and Exchange Commission, in effect overseeing the enormous fraud that sank WorldCom into bankruptcy in 2002.