Former WorldCom chief Bernard Ebbers testified yesterday he "just didn't see" glaring irregularities in internal financial papers that he...
NEW YORK — Former WorldCom chief Bernard Ebbers testified yesterday he “just didn’t see” glaring irregularities in internal financial papers that he reviewed while the company’s $11 billion fraud was under way.
In a daylong cross-examination by a federal prosecutor, Ebbers gave his most detailed denial yet that he had anything to do with the improper accounting that bankrupted the company.
Ebbers was presented with a WorldCom budget report that showed so-called line-cost expenses at $732 million in September 2000, only half the $1.4 billion budgeted by the company.
Most Read Stories
- I didn’t get it right with Seahawks’ Michael Bennett, and I apologize
- Seahawk legend Cortez Kennedy dead at 48
- What drivers can and cannot do under Washington state's new distracted-driving law
- What was that glowing orb that Trump touched in Saudi Arabia?
- Family of girl snatched by sea lion lambasted for ‘reckless behavior’ WATCH
The report was doctored, reflecting adjustments made by WorldCom accountants to cover up line costs that were much higher that summer than the company expected.
Prosecutor David Anders asked Ebbers whether he noticed the gap.
“If I would have noticed that, we would not be here today,” Ebbers responded. The former CEO said he paid more attention to other expenses in the document, such as administrative costs.
Ebbers took the witness stand in his own defense Monday and denied knowing anything about the accounting fraud. The defense says it was the work of finance chief Scott Sullivan.
Six hours of testimony
Yesterday, under six hours of intense questioning by Anders, Ebbers expanded the denial to include each quarter of the fraud, which ended in 2002.
When Anders showed him a doctored report that reflected line costs dropping to from $1.6 billion in October and November 2000 to $858 million in December, Ebbers said: “I just didn’t see it.”
Presented with a report with a similar gap for the first quarter of 2001 Ebbers said he probably just tossed it in the trash.
“So it’s your testimony,” Anders said at the end of the day, “that WorldCom reduced its line costs through adjustments of more than $2 billion — and you had no idea?”
“That’s correct,” Ebbers said.
Sullivan, who testified for the government earlier in the case, claims Ebbers was obsessed with hitting Wall Street earnings and pressured him each quarter into committing the fraud.
The former finance chief said Ebbers attended a meeting during the spring of 2001 in Ashburn, Va., in which he was told that line costs were spiraling out of control.
On cross-examination yesterday, Ebbers said he thought he was invited to that meeting “to do my cheerleader thing and give the troops a little pep talk.”
Pressed about why they needed a pep talk, Ebbers said Sullivan had told him there was a “lack of harmony” among line-cost employees — not that line costs were alarmingly high.
Earlier yesterday, Anders sought to show Ebbers felt intense pressure as his company’s stock fell, threatening hundreds of millions of dollars of his personal loans.
The prosecutor walked Ebbers through a series of margin calls issued by Bank of America in 2000, demanding more collateral for the loans as the stock fell.
Ebbers eventually was forced to pledge all of his WorldCom stock to the bank.
“That didn’t feel good, did it, Mr. Ebbers?” Anders asked.
“Margin calls don’t ever feel good,” Ebbers said.
Anders appeared to be trying to seek support for his argument that Ebbers, worried about the loans, pressured WorldCom accountants to submit rosy numbers to Wall Street.
Under questioning from his own lawyer, Ebbers chuckled occasionally, sometimes sprinkling his answers with Southern phrases, which the native Canadian acquired after moving to the United States. On cross-examination yesterday, he appeared more combative, often saying he did not recall seeing certain documents.
As the stock fell in 2000 and 2001, WorldCom guaranteed Ebbers’ loans, amounting to more than $350 million. Ebbers said he could have sold WorldCom stock to pay off the bank, but was instructed by WorldCom’s board not to sell.
Ebbers also conceded under questioning from the prosecutor that he was “fairly detail-oriented” as a manager, but only “in the areas that I paid particular attention to.”
Certain expenses noted
His lawyers have argued Ebbers was uncomfortable with accounting and finance, and left those matters to Sullivan.
Anders showed Ebbers documents that Ebbers had reviewed during his time as CEO, including a complex 2001 budget document that broke down revenue projections by sales channel and account representative.
Ebbers also admitted he focused on certain expenses. “It was important to me to supervise the parts of the company that I was responsible for,” Ebbers said.
Anders replied, “You’re the CEO of the company, so at some level, you’re responsible for the entire company.”
Ebbers also sharply denied a suggestion by the prosecutor that he once tried to withhold WorldCom business from Bank of America unless the bank agreed to give him more flexibility on repaying personal loans.
Anders showed jurors an e-mail from Sullivan to Ebbers in March 2002 in which Sullivan proposes awarding 40 percent of a $700 million debt transaction to Bank of America.
Ebbers scribbled in the margin: “Only use BofA if we have to?”