Similar lawsuits filed against 2 other companies.
Digeo, the Kirkland digital media company founded by Paul Allen, filed a lawsuit this week claiming that audiobook retailer Audible has infringed Digeo’s patent related to the distribution of electronic information.
Audible, based in Wayne, N.J., is the third company Digeo has sued alleging infringement on its patent, which was filed in 1996 and granted in 1998. Digeo has filed similar lawsuits against mobile-device software company PalmSource and digital music company MusicMatch.
All the lawsuits relate to a patent Digeo acquired in 2002 from a St. Louis company called Microtome. The patent describes a method of sending information from a central information bank to a user’s storage system for later access. The downloaded information would automatically be erased after a designated time.
Most Read Stories
- Seattle just broke a 122-year-old record for rain — because of course it did
- Texas football player’s story prompts probe of Garfield High School recruitment
- Seattle area home-price hikes lead the U.S. again; even century-old homes commanding top dollar
- Judge blocks Trump threat to withhold 'sanctuary city' funds VIEW
- Fishing 101 can help parents cope with daughter’s nasty ‘best friend’ | Dear Carolyn
The patent also describes a self-service information vending device called a “Book Bank,” which would download encrypted information to a user’s storage system. The patent specifies that the information could also include music, videos and computer software.
Audible’s sales have soared recently, partly because of its tie to the popular iPod music player. The company provides audiobook downloads for Amazon.com and Apple Computer’s iTunes music store, and reported $34.4 million in sales last year — a 78 percent increase over the year before.
Digeo’s lawsuit claims that Audible’s method of selling and distributing audiobooks is “functionally indistinguishable” from the electronic book distribution system described in its patent. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Seattle, asks that Audible be barred from selling any products that infringe on the patent. It also asks for unspecified damages, and that those damages be trebled in accordance with patent law.
Audible spokesman Jonathan Korzen said yesterday that his company had no comment on the lawsuit. PalmSource said last October that it would license Digeo’s patents as part of a lawsuit settlement but did not disclosed the financial terms. MusicMatch also has not disclosed the terms of its settlement, which was reached with Digeo last month.
Michael Markman, senior director of marketing at Digeo, said that the patent covers some products the company has planned for the future as well as its Moxi Media Center. The media center is being deployed in 25 cities around the country, and offers a digital video recorder, video-on-demand and an interactive television guide.
Markman would not say whether Diego planned to file additional patent-infringement lawsuits in the future.
“We take intellectual property very seriously, both our own and others,” he said. “We do want to enforce our patent rights if we think they’re being violated.”
Kim Peterson: 206-464-2360 or email@example.com