Sheryl Connelly is the rare auto-industry expert who has almost nothing to do with cars. As Ford Motor’s manager of global trends and the future, her role isn’t to look at the industry but outside it, to determine what factors will influence cars in the coming decades. Fast Company magazine recently named Connelly to its list of 100 most creative business people. We sat down with her at Ford’s Irvine, Calif., headquarters to peer into her crystal ball.
Q: As Ford’s first and only in-house futurist, what exactly are you trying to achieve?
A: It takes Ford Motor three years to bring a vehicle to market, so even if we have the most ingenious idea today, what feels cutting edge at this point might not be. We have no crystal ball, but we can look to five arenas for guidance: social, technological, economic, environmental and political.
Q: Why those five arenas?
- The hidden homeless: families in the suburbs
- Home prices charge ahead, driving some buyers farther afield
- How the Seahawks got two first-round picks in the NFL draft
- Here are Seattle-area companies employees enjoy working at most
- Mayor, Chris Hansen denounce misogynistic comments over council arena vote
Most Read Stories
A: You start there because you’ll never be able to predict the future, but those will be the forces that shape the landscape. It gives us a framework to play in this space of “What if?” and “If so, then what?” You talk about the possibilities, and then you explore what it means for the industry — what it does to demand, supply, competitors, retail, the distribution network. Only if you’ve explored all of that do you even ask what that means for Ford.
Q: What timeline are you looking at?
A: The most distant function in the Ford team is advanced product research and engineering. It’s trying to figure out what technologies are on the horizon and what to invest in. Their time horizon is 10, 20 years out.
Q: How far into the future are you looking?
A: 2050 is the furthest I go. This work is a delicate balance because you want to be provocative, but you have to be plausible.
Q: What might be on the horizon 37 years from now that you’re already contemplating?
A: Here’s the paradox. My role as a futurist is to remind people no one can predict the future. There is a range of possibilities. The future of mobility is going to be driven, in part, by the future of work. And the future of work is going to be driven, in part, by the future of education. The future of education is going to be driven, in part, by government spending. Government spending depends on the geopolitical landscape. Everything is interrelated.
Q: Are you seeing any specific trends?
A: There are a couple trends that I know will set the stage. One is a rise in population, from 7 billion to 9 billion. That’s a conservative estimate. Some say we could be up to 10 or 11 billion. That growth is happening in parts of the world that can least handle it, in China, India and Africa. What that means is failing infrastructure, inconsistent governance, widening gaps between the haves and have-nots, and widespread poverty. So if you step away from that, what about the bread-and-butter markets we sell to? Where will they be?
Q: How does an aging population affect automotive design?
A: Engineers ask how to ensure the freedom, autonomy and independence that comes from owning and operating your own vehicle. We also know that if you have a large segment of the population that’s aging, there are physiological changes that are likely to happen such as reduced response time, impaired vision and limited range of motion. We’re already designing for those today. Rearview cameras let drivers see without turning their necks. Collision alerts help drivers respond more quickly.
Q: How else does an aging population affect factors that ultimately affect cars?
A: The United Nations has said this aging of the world’s population will be the biggest challenge we face in our lifetime. Socially, who will care for these people? The real issue is the economics. How many workers do you have supporting the nonworking population?
By 2030, Japan, will have 108 retirees supported by 100 workers. As a consequence, their economic output will slow down; GDP will drop. There will be less money for investment and innovation as savings erode, and this will take away some of their technological prowess, their social influence, their political domain and it will migrate somewhere else. Odds are it will migrate to China and India.
Q: Japan is one of the world’s largest economies and one of its largest auto producers. If Japan moves lower on the totem pole, how do China and India fit in?
A: India has one of the youngest populations in the world, with a dependency ratio of 24 retirees for every 100 workers by 2030. That’s known as a demographic dividend. China is just finishing its demographic dividend. That’s what caused its economic boom for the last 15 years. India has greater potential than China because it will surpass China in population, but its challenge is weak infrastructure.
If it can’t find ways to meaningfully educate or employ the population, the opportunity could be squandered.
How will traffic congestion affect the car industry?
A: Global gridlock is what our chairman, Bill Ford, worries about. Some people project up to 4 billion cars on the road, but if those cars aren’t moving, they benefit no one. He believes in an idea that was shared by his great-grandfather, Henry: Mobility is a fundamental component to the advancement of freedom and innovation. I
What he is thinking about right now is: How do we make sure Ford is positioned to be part of the solution and not the problem? He spent the last 30 years of his life worried about selling as many cars as possible, and now he worries what will happen if we continue to sell as many cars as possible.
So perhaps the future is about mobility solutions that are multimodal: bike, rail, car. I don’t think individual vehicle ownership is going away, but in some parts of the world that might not be the pinnacle of aspiration.
Q: What does all this mean for the near term?
A: It means we have to challenge our assumptions about the status quo and where it’s headed. Cars today are much more than mere transportation, and they’re no longer the quintessential status symbol. I like to think of it as the Swiss army knife of mobility. When you’re in your car, what else is it doing for you? Is it managing your relationships? Is it your only sanctuary?
Q: Is it a blessing in disguise that younger adults are more interested in mobile devices than cars?
A: It challenges us to be more innovative. A boomer might have been drawn to our cars because of the horsepower and the sound of the throttle. Millennials are saying, ‘You’re going to need to give me more than that.’ That’s good for everyone.