Amazon is offering authors caught up in its dispute with Hachette Book Group all of the proceeds from the sale of any digital book, seeking to bypass the publisher and appeal directly to the writers.
Seattle-based Amazon sent a letter to writers, including Douglas Preston, proposing to take them out of the middle of the spat by giving them all of any e-book revenue, Preston said in an interview. Preston, co-author of the Pendergast series of books, led an effort to rally authors and readers to petition Amazon to end the dispute.
The world’s largest online retailer blocked preorders for some of Hachette’s books earlier this year, including “The Silkworm,” a new novel by J.K. Rowling, writing under the pseudonym Robert Galbraith.
Amazon and Hachette are each seeking a greater share of e-book income. While physical book sales in the U.S. are projected to fall to $19.5 billion this year from $26 billion in 2010, e-book revenue is anticipated to jump more than eightfold to $8.7 billion, according to Forrester Research. The growth is being spurred by the increasing consumer use of tablets and smartphones, through which people read e-books.
- Students seeking sugar daddies for tuition, rent
- Seattle-based seafood company shuts down
- What's the top spelling 'mistake' in Washington state? The answer could make you sick
- UW receiver Isaiah Renfro opens up about depression, announces he's leaving team
- Dead whale found on bow of cruise ship in Alaska
Most Read Stories
“Hachette would never accept something like this,” Preston said of Amazon’s proposal, saying it would violate writers’ contracts. “It seems to me like an attempt to divide authors from publishers. It seems like a negotiating ploy rather than a serious attempt to bring the two sides together.”
Hachette will continue to negotiate for a contract with Amazon that would benefit both parties, said Sophie Cottrell, a spokeswoman for Hachette.
“We invite Amazon to withdraw the sanctions they have unilaterally imposed,” she said, adding that the publisher seeks to resolve the dispute soon “to the benefit of the writers.”
Amazon, meantime, said Hachette is putting authors in the middle of the dispute to try to increase its leverage.
“Our offer is sincere,” Sarah Gelman, a spokeswoman for Amazon, said in a statement. “They are stalling and refusing to negotiate, despite the pain caused to their authors.”
Preston, working with a few others such as thriller writer Joseph Finder and fellow Hachette author David Baldacci, said he uploaded the Amazon petition on July 3 to the website he shares with Lincoln Child. Though he expected only a few dozen writers to sign on, Preston said 600 to 800 have added their names so far. The response to his petition from all sorts of authors, from best-selling writers to first-timers and cookbook authors to mystery novelists, might have led Amazon to reach out to him, Preston said.
Three days after posting the petition, Preston said he received an email discussing the e-book sales offer from Russell Grandinetti, an executive at Amazon, followed by a phone call. In a “cordial” conversation, Grandinetti asked him what he thought about the proposal, Preston said.
“My message was, look, we’re not against Amazon, and we’re not for Hachette — all we’re asking is for you both to settle this problem without hurting authors,” Preston said.
Preston said accepting the offer would be a “moral and ethical violation,” as well as a contractual one. If he received $9.99 a sale on a digital book, he would make millions in a few months at the expense of his publisher, he said.
“That’s money that’s owed to them because they already gave me an advance, which I’m trying to earn back,” Preston said of Hachette. “It would be financially devastating to Hachette and really not affect Amazon at all.”
Amazon dominates e-book sales with 60 percent of the market, according to Forrester. The company also helped pioneer the e-book market with the introduction of the Kindle e-reading device in 2007.
Amazon’s offer to writers was reported earlier Tuesday by The Wall Street Journal.